Thin Clients White Papers
Thin Clients: A Cost-Effective Way to Improve Security
Overview Enterprise thin clients can offer organizations an opportunity to achieve two seemingly contradictory goals: improving security while lowering IT costs. Thin clients are diskless desktop devices that rely on a centralized server for their computing power. In contrast with a typical PC that may download applications via a client/server environment, thin clients are fully dependent on servers: all data and applications are stored on servers.
| Publisher | IDG (International Data Group) | File Format | PDF, requires Acrobat Rdr 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date Published | January 2004 | Downloads | 40 |
| Format | White Papers | ||
| Topics | |||
Thin-Client Vs. Fat-Client TCO
Thin-client deployment will offer substantial savings for enterprises without best practices for managing fat-client desktops, with a quick return on investment. Enterprises planning to deploy thin-client applications for TCO benefits...
The Total Economic Impact of Citrix MetaFrame Server-Based Computing Solutions
This paper highlights the benefits and costs of deploying Citrix MetaFrame solutions across the enterprise of a sample organization. The findings portrayed in this study are in large part based...
Quillix Document and Data Capture Version 2.0
The benefits of distributed document and data capture are obvious, the main one being the elimination of shipping costs. To realize those benefits to the fullest extent, true distributed capture...
Thin Clients: Selecting the Right Desktop Strategy for Your Organization
Thin clients can offer significant advantages when properly deployed. While cost has been the major factor touted by many thin client proponents, these machines can also improve security, manageability, and...
Mandatory Profiles with Outlook and Terminal Server
Terminal Server offers significant system lifecycle cost advantages including reduction of workstation software administration costs. To take full advantage of these savings it often makes sense to use mandatory user...



