Thin Clients White Papers
Thin-Client Vs. Fat-Client TCO
Overview Thin-client deployment will offer substantial savings for enterprises without best practices for managing fat-client desktops, with a quick return on investment. Enterprises planning to deploy thin-client applications for TCO benefits they expect to achieve must do a comprehensive analysis of costs for thin-client and fat-client deployment pertaining to their own particular environment.
| Publisher | Gartner | File Format | PDF, requires Acrobat Rdr 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date Published | September 2001 | Downloads | 2327 |
| Format | White Papers | ||
| Topics | |||
-
Did you find this white paper useful? 10 out of 11 users found this white paper useful
White Paper RSSThin-Client Vs. Fat-Client TCO
DownloadThin-client deployment will offer substantial savings for enterprises without best practices for managing fat-client desktops, with a quick return on investment. Enterprises planning to deploy thin-client applications for TCO benefits...
The Total Economic Impact of Citrix MetaFrame Server-Based Computing Solutions
This paper highlights the benefits and costs of deploying Citrix MetaFrame solutions across the enterprise of a sample organization. The findings portrayed in this study are in large part based...
Quillix Document and Data Capture Version 2.0
The benefits of distributed document and data capture are obvious, the main one being the elimination of shipping costs. To realize those benefits to the fullest extent, true distributed capture...
Thin Clients: Selecting the Right Desktop Strategy for Your Organization
Thin clients can offer significant advantages when properly deployed. While cost has been the major factor touted by many thin client proponents, these machines can also improve security, manageability, and...
Mandatory Profiles with Outlook and Terminal Server
Terminal Server offers significant system lifecycle cost advantages including reduction of workstation software administration costs. To take full advantage of these savings it often makes sense to use mandatory user...
